Sistemas de informação em saúde: a importância do software livre e da modelagem multinível

Autores/as

  • Luciana Tricai Cavalini UERJ
  • Timothy Wayne Cook LA-MLHIM

Palabras clave:

Informática Médica, Desenho de Programas de Computador, Sistemas de Informação

Resumen

A informação em saúde apresenta complexidades significativas em termos espaço-temporais e de domínio, o que traz desafios para o desenvolvimento de sistemas de informação em saúde centrados no paciente, interoperáveis e semanticamente coerentes. Este artigo de revisão sustenta a ideia de que a abordagem de modelagem multinível é essencial para garantir a interoperabilidade a nível semântico, mas uma verdadeira interoperabilidade só é obtida com a adoção de padrões abertos, e implementações de código aberto são necessárias para promover a concorrência com base na qualidade do software. As especificações Multilevel Healthcare Information Modeling (MLHIM) são apresentadas, como uma referência para a modelagem multinível totalmente baseada em software livre, e são sugeridas boas práticas para o desenvolvimento de aplicativos para a área de saúde baseados em modelagem multinível e software livre.

Biografía del autor/a

Luciana Tricai Cavalini, UERJ

Professora Adjunto do Departamento de Tecnologias de Informação e Educação em Saúde da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da UERJ - Doutorado em Saúde Coletiva pelo Instituto de Medicina Social da UERJ.

Timothy Wayne Cook, LA-MLHIM

Colaborador Internacional do Laboratório “Multilevel Healthcare Information Modeling” (LA-MLHIM), Associado ao Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia - Medicina Assistida por Computaçao Científica - Mestre em Health Informatics pela University of Central Lancashire

Citas

Hudson DL, Cohen ME. Uncertainty and complexity in personal health records. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 6773-6.

Kelley J. The interoperability hang-up. When it comes to information exchange, how should precede what. Health Manag Technol 2011; 32(2): 32, 34.

Haughton J. Look up: the right EHR may be in the cloud. Major advantages include interoperability and flexibility. Health Manag Technol 2011; 32(2): 52.

Hammond WE, Bailey C, Boucher P, Spohr M, Whitaker P. Connecting information to improve health. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29(2): 284-8.

Garde S, Chen R, Leslie H, Beale T, McNicoll I, Heard S. Archetype-based knowledge management for semantic interoperability of electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150: 1007-11.

Haux R. Medical informatics: past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79(9): 599-610.

Blobel B. Comparing concepts for electronic health record architectures. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 90: 209-14.

Cantiello J, Cortelyou-Ward KH. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: lessons learned from physicians who have gone electronic. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2010; 29(4): 332-8.

Michelsen L, Pedersen SS, Tilma HB, Andersen SK. Comparing different approaches to two-level modelling of electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 113-8.

Eccles M, Mason J. How to develop cost-conscious guidelines. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5(16): 1-69.

Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S. The openEHR Foundation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 115: 153-73.

Kohl CD, Garde S, Knaup P. Facilitating secondary use of medical data by using openEHR archetypes. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160(Pt 2): 1117-21.

Garde S, Knaup P, Hovenga E, Heard S. Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(3): 332-43.

Ammenwerth E, Shaw NT. Bad informatics can kill: is evaluation the answer? Methods Inf Med 2005; 44(1): 1-3.

Chen R, Klein G. The openEHR Java reference implementation project. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129(Pt 1): 58-62.

Kashfi H. An openEHR-based clinical decision support system: a case study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150: 348.

Martinez-Costa C, Menarguez-Tortosa M, Fernandez-Breis JT. An approach for the semantic interoperability of ISO EN 13606 and OpenEHR archetypes. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43(5): 736-46.

Almeida F, Oliveira J, Cruz J. Open standards and open source: enabling interoperability. Int J Soft Eng App 2011; 2(1):10.5121/ijsea.2011.2101.

Dutton WH. Key enablers for eTransformation? eID, interoperability and open source. Eur J ePractice 2009; 6:2.

Reynolds CJ, Wyatt JC. Open Source, open standards, and health care information systems. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e24.

Barretto SA, Warren J, Goodchild A, Bird L, Heard S, Stumptner M. Linking guidelines to Electronic Health Record design for improved chronic disease management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 66-70.

Beale T, Heard S. openEHR Architecture overview. London 2008; openEHR Foundation.

Neeser AE. XML: The open source solution to interoperability. Open Lib Class J 2009; 1(2). Available at http://www.infosherpas.com/ojs/index.php/openandlibraries/article/view/31/40. Accessed on Mar 6th, 2011.

Paterson T, Law A. An XML transfer schema for exchange of genomic and genetic mapping data: implementation as a web service in a Taverna workflow. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10:252.

Seibel PN, Krüger J, Hartmeier S, Schwarzer K, Löwenthal K, Mersch H, Dandekar T, Giegerich R. XML Schemas for common bioinformatic data types and their application in workflow systems. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:490.

Norlin C, Kerr LM, Rocha RA. Using clinical questions to structure the content of a web-based information resource for primary care physicians. AMIA Symp Proc 2009; 482-6.

Zhao L, Lee KP, Hu J. Generating XML Schemas for DICOM structured reporting templates. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:72-83.

Gao S, Mioc D, Yi X, Anton F, Oldfield E, Coleman DJ. Towards web-based representation and processing of health information. Int J Health Geographics 2009; 8:3.

Hägglund M, Scandurra I, Moström D, Koch S. Bridging the gap: a virtual health record for integrated home care. Int J Integr Care 2007; 7:26.

Qian Y, Tchuvatkina O, Spidlen J, Wilkinson P, Gasparetto M, Jones AR, Manion FJ, Scheuermann RH, Sekaly RP, Brinkman RR. FuGEFlow: data model and markup language for flow cytometry. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10:184.

Hulse NC, Rocha RA, Del Fiol G, Bradshaw RD, Hanna TP, Roemer LK. KAT: A flexible XML-based knowledge authoring environment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:418-430.

Rinner C, Janzek-Hawlat S, Sibinovic S, Duftschmid G. Semantic validation of standard-based electronic health record documents with W3C XML schema. Methods Inf Med 2010;49(3):271-80.

Maldonado JA, Moner D, Bosca D, Fernandez-Breis JT, Angulo C, Robles M. LinkEHR-Ed: a multi-reference model archetype editor based on formal semantics. Int J Med Inform 2008; 78(8): 559-70.

Sundvall E, Qamar R, Nystrom M, Forss M, Petersson H, Karlsson D, Ahlfeldt H, Rector A. Integration of tools for binding archetypes to SNOMED CT. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8 Suppl 1: S7.

D’Antoni AV, Zipp GP, Olson VG, Cahill TF. Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 61.

Publicado

2012-09-14

Cómo citar

1.
Cavalini LT, Cook TW. Sistemas de informação em saúde: a importância do software livre e da modelagem multinível. JBT [Internet]. 14 de septiembre de 2012 [citado 6 de diciembre de 2025];1(1):15-22. Disponible en: https://jbt.abtms.org.br/index.php/jbt/article/view/7

Número

Sección

Artigos de Revisão