XML Technologies for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare: Technical Background and Implementation

Authors

  • Luciana Tricai Cavalini Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Arôvel Oliveira Moura Júnior Instituto Nacional do Câncer
  • Pedro Monteiro Menezes Hospital Sarah-Rio
  • Timothy Wayne Cook MedWeb 3.0

Keywords:

Information Exchange, Electronic Health Records, Software Design

Abstract

Aims: To report the implementation of the MLHIM Reference Model in XML Schema Definition language version 1.1 as well as a set of examples of healthcare concepts generated from the National Cancer Institute – Common Data Elements (NCI CDE) repository. Materials and Methods: The Multilevel Healthcare Information Modeling (MLHIM) specifications have adopted the XML Schema Definition 1.1 as the basis for its reference implementation, since XML technologies are consistent across all platforms and operating systems, with tools available for all mainstream programming languages. Results: In the MLHIM specifications, the healthcare knowledge representation is defined by the Domain Model, expressed as Concept Constraint Definitions (CCDs), which provide the semantic interpretation of the objects persisted according to the generic Reference Model classes. The set of CCDs was the base for the simulation of semantically coherent data instances, according to independent XML validators, persisted on an XML database. Conclusion: This paper shows the feasibility of adopting XML technologies for the achievement of semantic interoperability in real healthcare scenarios, by providing application developers with a significant amount of industry experience and a wide array of tools through XML technologies.

Author Biographies

Luciana Tricai Cavalini, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Professora Adjunta do Departamento de Tecnologias da Informação e Educação em Saúde - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Doutorado em Saúde Pública;

Arôvel Oliveira Moura Júnior, Instituto Nacional do Câncer

Médico do Instituto Nacional do Câncer - Mestre em Saúde Materno-Infantil

Pedro Monteiro Menezes, Hospital Sarah-Rio

Analista de Sistemas do Hospital Sarah-Rio - Tecnólogo em Sistemas de Informação;

Timothy Wayne Cook, MedWeb 3.0

Chief Technological Officer da MedWeb 3.0 - MSc in Health Informatics

References

ACMI. 1961 electronic medical records. Disponível em: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-aiKlIc6uk. Acesso em 01/04/2013.

De Leon S, Connelly-Flores A, Mostashari F, Shih SC. The business end of health information technology. Can a fully integrated electronic health record increase provider productivity in a large community practice? J Med Pract Manage 2010; 25:342-9.

U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2011AA SNOMED CT Source Information. Disponível em: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/sourcereleasedocs/current/SNOMEDCT. Acesso em 28/04/2013.

Maojo V, Kulikowski C. Medical informatics and bioinformatics: integration or evolution through scientific crises? Methods Inf Med 2006; 45:474-82.

Zusman EE. Form facilitates function: innovations in architecture and design drive quality and efficiency in healthcare. Neurosurgery 2010;66:N24.

Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;Suppl 3:i68-74.

Raths D. Shifting away from silos. the interoperability challenges that hospitals face pale in comparison to the headaches plaguing State Departments. Healthc Inform 2010;27:32-

Blobel B, Pharow P. Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;136:359-64.

Blobel B. Ontologies, knowledge representation, artificial intelligence: hype or prerequisites for international pHealth interoperability? Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 165:11-20.

Saleem JJ, Russ AL, Neddo A, Blades PT, Doebbeling BN, Foresman BH. Paper persistence, workarounds, and communication breakdowns in computerized consultation management. Int J Med Inform 2011;80(7):466-79.

Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S. The openEHR Foundation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 115:153-73.

Martinez-Costa C, Menarguez-Tortosa M, Fernandez-Breis JT. Towards ISO 13606 and openEHR archetype-based semantic interoperability. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:260-4.

Cavalini LT, Cook TW. Use of XML Schema Definition for the development of semantically interoperable healthcare applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2014; 8315:125-45.

Menezes AL, Cirilo CE, Moraes JLC, Souza WL, Prado AF. Using archetypes and domain specific languages on development of ubiquitous applications to pervasive healthcare. Proc IEEE 23rd Int Symp Comput Bas Med Syst 2010; 395-400.

Cavalini LT, Cook TW. Knowledge engineering of healthcare applications based on minimalist multilevel models. IEEE 14th Int Conf e-Health Networ Appl Serv 2012; 431-4.

Sanderson DB. Loss of data semantics in syntax directed translation. PhD Thesis in Computer Sciences. New York 1994; Renesselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Cook TW, Cavalini LT. Implementing a specification for exceptional data in multilevel modeling of healthcare applications. ACM SIGHIT Rec 2012; 2:11.

Lee T, Hon CT, Cheung D. XML Schema design and management for e-government data interoperability. Electr J e-Gov 2009; 381-391.

Daconta MC, Obrst LJ, Smith KT. The Semantic Web. Indianapolis 2003; Wiley.

Kashfi H, Torgersson O. A migration to an openEHR-based clinical application. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009; 150:152-6.

Published

2013-12-01

How to Cite

1.
Cavalini LT, Moura Júnior AO, Menezes PM, Cook TW. XML Technologies for Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare: Technical Background and Implementation. JBT [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 1 [cited 2026 Jan. 27];2(4):65-78. Available from: https://jbt.abtms.org.br/index.php/jbt/article/view/35

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais